This article is available in: 日本語
Introduction
The beauty of Taylor expansion is that functions can be expressed in polynomial form.
When I first learned it, I was not surprised why a function \(f(x)\) could be expressed as a polynomial. This time, I would like to understand the reason loosely.
Taylor expansion is expressed as follows
or it may also be expressed as
Let us now derive the first table expression.
Why can it be expressed in polynomial form?
Suppose the function \(f(x)\) has the form shown in the figure above.
Out of the blue, consider a line passing through the points \( (a,\, f(a)) \) and \( (a + h,\, f(a + h)) \) (blue line in Figure 1). The slope of this line is
\frac{f(a + h)\, – f(a)}{h}\tag{1}
\end{eqnarray}
f^{\prime}(a + \theta_1 h) = \frac{f(a + h)\, – f(a)}{h}
\end{eqnarray*}
f(a + h) = f(a) + f^{\prime}(a + \theta_1 h)\, h \tag{2}
\end{eqnarray}
So next, consider the graph of the function\(f^{\prime}(x)\). Suppose it takes the form shown in the figure below.
As before, consider a line passing through the points \((a,\, f^{\prime}(a)) \) and \((a + \theta_1 h,\, f^{\prime}(a +\theta_1 h)) \) (blue line in Figure 2). The slope of this line is
\frac{f^{\prime}(a + \theta_1 h)\, – f^{\prime}(a)}{\theta_1 h}\tag{3}
\end{eqnarray*}
f^{\prime\prime}(a + \theta_1 \theta_2 h) = \frac{f^{\prime}(a + h)\, – f^{\prime}(a)}{\theta_1 h}
\end{eqnarray*}
f^{\prime}(a + h) = f^{\prime}(a) + \theta_1 f^{\prime\prime}(a + \theta_1 \theta_2 h)\, h
\end{eqnarray*}
Substituting this expression into (2), we obtain
f(a + h) = f(a) + f^{\prime}(a)\, h + \theta_1 f^{\prime\prime}(a + \theta_1 \theta_2 h)\, h^2
\end{eqnarray*}
Repeating these operations many times, it seems that the function \(f\) can be expressed as a polynomial in \(h\). If the function \(f(x)\) is infinitely differentiable around \(a\), then
f(a + h) &=& f(a) + f^{\prime}(a)\, h + \theta_1 f^{\prime\prime}(a)\, h^2 + \theta_1 \theta_2 f^{(3)}(a + \theta_1 \theta_2 \theta_3 h)\, h^3 \\
\\
f(a + h) &=& f(a) + f^{\prime}(a)\, h + \theta_1 f^{\prime\prime}(a)\, h^2 + \theta_1 \theta_2 f^{(3)}(a)\, h^3 + \theta_1 \theta_2 \theta_3 f^{(4)}(a + \theta_1 \theta_2 \theta_3 \theta_4 h)\, h^4 \\
\\
&\vdots & \\
\\
f(a + h) &=& f(a) + f^{\prime}(a)\, h + \theta_1 f^{\prime\prime}(a)\, h^2 + \theta_1 \theta_2 f^{(3)}(a)\, h^3 + \cdots + \theta_1 \theta_2 \cdots \theta_{n-1} f^{(n)}(a)\, h^n + \cdots
\end{eqnarray*}
The coefficients \(\theta_1 \theta_2 \cdots \) for each term are \(c\) and \(h = x-a\) and again
f(x) = f(a) + c_1f^{\prime}(a)\, (x – a) + c_2f^{\prime\prime}(a)\, (x-a)^2 &+& c_3f^{(3)}(a)\, (x-a)^3 \\ &+& \cdots + c_n f^{(n)}(a)\, (x-a)^n + \cdots \tag{☆}
\end{eqnarray*}
Find the value of the coefficient
To find the value of the coefficient \(c_i\), we differentiate equation (☆) by \(x\) in the first order. Then, we obtain
f^{\prime}(x) = c_1f^{\prime}(a) + 2\, c_2f^{\prime\prime}(a)\, (x-a) + 3\, c_3f^{(3)}(a)\, (x-a)^2 + \cdots + n\, c_n f^{(n)}(a)\, (x-a)^{n-1} + \cdots
\end{eqnarray*}
f^{\prime}(a) &=& c_1 f^{\prime}(a) \\
∴ c_1 &=& 1
\end{eqnarray*}
Similarly, second-order differentiation of equation (☆) with \(x\) yields
f^{\prime\prime}(x) = 2\cdot 1\, c_2f^{\prime\prime}(a) + 3\cdot 2\, c_3f^{(3)}(a)\, (x-a) + \cdots + n \cdot (n-1)\, c_n f^{(n)}(a)\, (x-a)^{n-2} + \cdots
\end{eqnarray*}
f^{\prime\prime}(a) &=& 2!\, c_2 f^{\prime\prime}(a) \\
∴ c_1 &=& \frac{1}{2!}
\end{eqnarray*}
Differentiating equation (☆) by \(x\), we obtain
f^{(3)}(x) = 3 \cdot 2\cdot 1\, c_3f^{(3)}(a) + \cdots + n \cdot (n-1) \cdot (n-2)\, c_n f^{(n)}(a)\, (x-a)^{n-3} + \cdots
\end{eqnarray*}
f^{\prime\prime}(a) &=& 3!\, c_3 f^{\prime\prime}(a) \\
∴ c_3 &=& \frac{1}{3!}
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, the coefficient \(c_n\) of the ith \(n\) item can be obtained by differentiating equation (☆) by \(x\) and substituting \(x = a\) for \(n\).
c_n = \frac{1}{n!}
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, equation (☆) is
f(x) = f(a) + f^{\prime}(a)\, (x – a) + \frac{1}{2!}f^{\prime\prime}(a)\, (x-a)^2 + \cdots + \frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(a)\, (x-a)^n + \cdots
\end{eqnarray*}
We were able to derive a tabular expression for the Taylor expansion.
Click here ▼ for an example of Taylor expansion.
Taylor expansion of a two-variable function is here▼.